z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Gender, Education and Socioeconomic Status: Economic Theories, Credentialism and Beyond
Author(s) -
Jean McKenzie Leiper
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
canadian journal of higher education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2293-6602
pISSN - 0316-1218
DOI - 10.47678/cjhe.v23i1.183149
Subject(s) - socioeconomic status , human capital , human capital theory , work (physics) , economics , value (mathematics) , sociology , psychology , demographic economics , social psychology , economic growth , population , demography , mechanical engineering , machine learning , computer science , engineering
Human capital theory, market signalling theory and credentialism are explored as ways of explaining the relationship between formal education and socioeconomic status. For both men and women, years of schooling and diplomas or degrees help to ensure access to high-skill jobs which carry high socioeconomic status. The market signalling approach is relevant for men because skills, are positively associated with socioeconomic status: employers value diplomas and degrees if they indicate that employees bring high skill levels to the labour market. The market signalling approach is not confirmed for women in this study. Some economists suggest that human capital theory is limited because it assumes women make voluntary choices to limit their education and job experience in favour of family responsibilities. Credentialism, by discounting the importance of skills acquired in school, ignores the issue of gender-based power differences that are related to skills. New theories are needed to address the issues of work and family commitments for both women and men.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here