z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparative Plasma Levels of Angiotensin II in Women with or without Uterine Fibroid in Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria
Author(s) -
OO Orekoya
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of gynecology research reviews and reports
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2634-1255
DOI - 10.47363/jgrrr/2022(4)149
Subject(s) - uterine fibroids , medicine , gynecology , obstetrics , blood pressure , angiotensin ii , uterus
Background: Uterine fibroid is the most common tumour in women reproductive age group Recently uterine fibroids have been noticed to be more common in patients with hypertension, another disease with a predilection for the black race. The study compares the serum levels of angiotensin II in women with uterine fibroids and women without uterine fibroids. Methods/Designs: The study was a prospective case-controlled study involving ninety consecutive women with a confirmed diagnosis of uterine fibroids and ninety consecutive women with intact uterus with no sonological diagnosis of uterine fibroids matched for age, parity and body mass index. A structured interviewer-administered questionnaire was completed for each subject, who also had their blood pressure checked in the clinic and 5ml of venous blood drawn for angiotensin 2 assay. The uterine size was measured in pregnancy weeks. The data obtained were processed and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences, (SPSS) version 20. Results: The mean serum level of angiotensin II in women with uterine fibroids was significantly higher than that in women without uterine fibroids, (0.71±0.07ng/ml vs. 0.23±0.07ng/ml), p <0.001. The mean systolic blood pressure was significantly higher in respondents with uterine fibroids (122.99±16.01 vs. 112.92±13.22mmhg), p<0.001. Women with uterine fibroids were about six times more likely to have hypertension than women without fibroids, p= 0.01. Conclusion: Uterine fibroids and hypertension are associated with higher levels of angiotensin II, suggesting a possible important aetiological role in both by angiotensin II.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here