z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of the Health Cost of Organic and Conventional Vegetable Cultivation in Getasan Sub-district, Semarang, Indonesia
Author(s) -
Supriyono Asfawi,
Ari Probandari,
Prabang Setyono,
Hartono Hartono
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of environmental science and management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.156
H-Index - 9
ISSN - 0119-1144
DOI - 10.47125/jesam/2021_1/04
Subject(s) - agriculture , organic farming , business , environmentally friendly , environmental health , environmental degradation , sustainable agriculture , agricultural science , environmental protection , natural resource economics , medicine , geography , environmental science , economics , ecology , archaeology , biology
Environmental damage will disrupt the ecosystem to support life. Unsustainable agriculture can be a source of environmental degradation. Conventional agriculture may have an effect on the environment, thus the participation of various parties in sustainable agriculture is needed. Organic agriculture is developed as an environmentally friendly agricultural cultivation with many benefits. Compared to the attention on occupational health, safety and environmental problems, economic motives receive less attention. This study aims to calculate the costs arising from the health impacts of vegetable cultivation. There were 314 respondents interviewed in this study. There were significant differences in the sickness complaints felt by respondents; organic farmer groups have the potential to incur health costs of Rp. 30,333.33, while the conventional group is higher, with a cost of Rp. 103.303.57 (US$ 7.38). Organic farming has a better impact because it uses natural ingredients and is not bad for health. The potential losses arising from health cases also show a high and significant number (p <0.001).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here