Open AccessDoes the quality and novel work save the researcher's effort and raise the likelihood of acceptance?
Author(s) -
Saad Ahmed Ali Jadoo
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of ideas in health :
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2645-9248
DOI - 10.47108/jidhealth.vol2.iss2.38
Subject(s) - quality (philosophy) , scope (computer science) , nothing , work (physics) , test (biology) , psychology , engineering ethics , sociology , computer science , engineering , epistemology , mechanical engineering , paleontology , philosophy , biology , programming language
Research is known to be of high quality when it passes the test of experienced peers, has a potential impact on the development of scientific research, and positively contributes to improving society. While the research considered novel when the researcher has his fingerprint in the world of scientific research, i.e., the outputs brought something new or not known before in the research world. Different reasons, such as repeated studies, plagiarism, grammatical errors, out of the journal scope, and nothing new contribute to pushing the research away from the interest of the publishers.