Open AccessGlasgow Coma Scale versus Full Outline of Unresponsiveness Scale in Predicting Discharge Outcomes of Traumatic Brain Injury
Author(s) -
Eman B. Kasem,
Mohammad Sahar Yassien,
Dalia A. Amin
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
evidence - based nursing research /evidence - based nursing research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2636-400X
pISSN - 2636-3992
DOI - 10.47104/ebnrojs3.v1i4.70
Subject(s) - glasgow coma scale , traumatic brain injury , neurosurgery , context (archaeology) , medicine , glasgow outcome scale , intensive care unit , physical therapy , physical medicine and rehabilitation , intensive care medicine , anesthesia , surgery , psychiatry , paleontology , biology
Context: Neurological assessment is an essential element of early warning scores used to recognize and early save the lives of critically ill patients.Aim: This study aimed to compare the full outline of Unresponsiveness Scale and the Glasgow Coma Scale in predicting discharge outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injuryMethod: A comparative research design conducted at Neurosurgery Intensive Care Unit in El Fayoum University Hospital. The Study recruited a purposive sample of 100 adult patients with TBI. They assessed using three tools (Patients Profile Data Form, Level of Consciousness Assessment," and Tool Discharge Data Assessment Record).Results: GCS is superior to FOUR score in prediction of length of stay and full recovery without any squeal while they are the same in the prediction of motor disability and sensory impairment (physical impairment). FOUR score is superior to GCS in the prediction of mortalityConclusion: the FOUR score provides more neurologic details than the GCS and is a valid predictor of outcome in patients with TBI; thus, it could be considered as a future prognostic model. It recommended for using FOUR score for predicting outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injuries as a valid predictor of discharge outcomes after traumatic brain injury.