Open AccessComparing the Meaning Potential in Shakespeare and Manto through Speech Acts: A Discourse Pragmatic Study
Author(s) -
Tazanfal Tehseem,
Muazzma Batool,
Aqsa Arshad,
Zohaib Hassan
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
review of education, administration and law
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2708-3667
pISSN - 2708-1788
DOI - 10.47067/real.v4i3.176
Subject(s) - hamlet (protein complex) , utterance , meaning (existential) , focus (optics) , linguistics , literature , speech act , psychology , epistemology , philosophy , art , physics , optics
This paper attempts to explain the application of speech act theory (John Searle, 1976) on the soliloquies expressed by Hamlet and Keshulal Singh. The descriptive focus of this study is to draw attention to the felicity conditions whether they are being fulfilled by the speakers while making an utterance or not. Content analysis based on speech act theory is used for this paper. It has been pointed out that declaratives are less while directives are more applicable on these soliloquies, with the help of analysis. Hamlet and Keshulal’s inner self is being depicted through their speeches and it is analyzed that they are so much upset and are in the situation of to be or not to be that they do not know what should be their strategies, in taking their revenge. In actuality, they are trying to extinguish the storm which is bursting inside them through their soliloquies but by comparing the inner devastation of both characters. It is highlighted that Hamlet’s soliloquies are more self-explanatory than that of Keshulal because Hamlet makes vows, questions, deplores, and challenges the circumstances more than the Keshulal.