z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A Single Surgeon’s Experience of Infection Rates in K-Wires in Hand Surgery: Buried vs. Exposed.
Publication year - 2020
Language(s) - English
DOI - 10.46940/sjomd.02.1008
Subject(s) - cohort , medicine , infection rate , surgery , track (disk drive) , significant difference , cohort study , engineering , mechanical engineering
There is anecdotal evidence suggesting buried K-wires are superior to unburied or exposed K-wires due to lower pin track infection rates, although the evidence remains unclear. We present a closed loop audit looking at a single surgeon’s experience of 111 consecutive cases requiring K-wires in hand surgery. Our pin track infection rates differed between a series of 3 consecutive cohorts. Pin track infection rates were 2% in an initial cohort of buried K-wires, 14.3% in a second cohort of exposed K-wires and 0% in a third cohort when practice was changed back to burying the K-wires. Our experience demonstrates there was a measurable difference in post-procedure infection rates between burying and exposing K-wire ends.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom