Open AccessImproving post-privatization control of social facilities as a factor in increasing the efficiency of their privatization
Author(s) -
Т.О. Ержанов,
A. G. Mukhamedzhanova
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
"tu̇ran" universitetìnìn̦ habarsysy/"tu̇ran" universitetìnìņ habaršysy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2959-1236
pISSN - 1562-2959
DOI - 10.46914/1562-2959-2020-1-3-204-210
Subject(s) - legislation , enforcement , control (management) , business , quality (philosophy) , position (finance) , property (philosophy) , field research , state (computer science) , process (computing) , field (mathematics) , public relations , social control , law and economics , public administration , political science , law , economics , sociology , finance , management , social science , philosophy , mathematics , epistemology , algorithm , computer science , pure mathematics , operating system
The article examines the legal foundations of post-privatization control of social facilities in Kazakhstan as a factor in increasing the efficiency of privatization. Based on the study of legislation, the current role and essence of post-privatization control has been determined. The current situation in the implementation of post-privatization control is analyzed, problems of the effectiveness of the implementation of post-privatization control are identified, and ways of their solution are proposed. The methodological basis of the research was formed by the methods of critical legal and content analysis. The research toolkit included criticism of the law enforcement practice of the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan in the field of state property, using a specific example. In addition, the author analyzed interviews and statements in the media of other stakeholders of the privatization process in order to study their position on the subject of this study. The results of the study show that, despite the optimistic attitude of representatives of state bodies against the background of the absence of negative “cases”, the current legislation regulating relations in the field of state property lacks effective mechanisms to influence purchasers of social facilities, which would ensure the protection of the interests of society in obtaining quality social services.