z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Grounded Theory and the Conundrum of Literature Review: Framework for Novice Researchers
Author(s) -
Mohamed Toufic El Hussein,
Andrea Kennedy,
Brent Oliver
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
the qualitative report
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.335
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2160-3715
DOI - 10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2661
Subject(s) - grounded theory , reflexivity , dilemma , epistemology , process (computing) , qualitative research , management science , sociology , computer science , engineering ethics , social science , philosophy , engineering , economics , operating system
The issue of the literature review remains a conundrum and a controversy within the discourse on grounded theory methodology. Grounded theory researchers are expected to minimize preconceptions to ensure the concept of interest is grounded in data, yet at the same time are required to evaluate existing literature to support institutional ethics and scientific review of the research proposal. In addressing this dilemma, we espouse that literature review in grounded theory should comprise a multistage nonlinear approach to the literature and introduce a framework for novice grounded theory researchers. This framework offers a reflexive, dynamic and integrative process for conducting a literature review that allows researchers to minimize preconceptions while maintaining the original intent of grounded theory methodology.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here