Open AccessThree Approaches to Case Study Methods in Education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake
Author(s) -
Bedrettin Yazan
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
the qualitative report
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2160-3715
DOI - 10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2102
Subject(s) - perspective (graphical) , sociology , field (mathematics) , educational research , qualitative research , epistemology , research methodology , engineering ethics , social science , computer science , population , philosophy , mathematics , pure mathematics , engineering , demography , artificial intelligence
Case study methodology has long been a contested terrain in social sciences research which is characterized by varying, sometimes opposing, approaches espoused by many research methodologists. Despite being one of the most frequently used qualitative research methodologies in educational research, the methodologists do not have a full consensus on the design and implementation of case study, which hampers its full evolution. Focusing on the landmark works of three prominent methodologists, namely Robert Yin, Sharan Merriam, Robert Stake, I attempt to scrutinize the areas where their perspectives diverge, converge and complement one another in varying dimensions of case study research. I aim to help the emerging researchers in the field of education familiarize themselves with the diverse views regarding case study that lead to a vast array of techniques and strategies, out of which they can come up with a combined perspective which best serves their research purpose.