Open AccessQueering Methodologies: Challenging Scientific Constraint in the Appreciation of Queer and Trans Subjects
Author(s) -
Joshua M. Ferguson
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
the qualitative report
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2160-3715
DOI - 10.46743/2160-3715/2013.1539
Subject(s) - queer , reflexivity , sociology , qualitative research , hegemony , epistemology , perspective (graphical) , queer theory , deconstruction (building) , binary opposition , injustice , aesthetics , gender studies , psychology , social psychology , social science , politics , computer science , ecology , philosophy , political science , law , biology , artificial intelligence
Qualitative studies require a queer perspective to challenge stagnant forms of scientific discourse. This paper argues for a deconstruction of hegemonic qualitative practices in order to appreciate and listen to queer and trans subjects when employing qualitative research and methodologies. I focus on qualitative methods from an audiovisual perspective to suggest that there is scientific constraint in the way researchers still approach qualitative methodologies. I propose some foundations for thinking about queer qualitative methods that employs queer theory in relation to a self - reflexive creative perspective towards ethics, research and representation. Moreover, I critically analyze the HBO trans documentary, Middle Sexes: Redefining He and She (Antony Thomas 2005), in order to move beyond complacent documentaries that employ interviews as a way of categorizing and containing gender diversity. I work towards future methodological promises for the exploration of queer and trans subjects. Further, this paper challenges the problems of imposing binary - based categories that not only obscure thorough understandings of gender but also perpetuate social injustice.