
Collaboration vs. Individualism: What Is Better for the Rising Academic?
Author(s) -
Andrew T. Kemp
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
the qualitative report
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2160-3715
DOI - 10.46743/2160-3715/2013.1429
Subject(s) - individualism , scholarship , strengths and weaknesses , competition (biology) , sociology , relation (database) , narrative , productivity , rank (graph theory) , public relations , psychology , engineering ethics , social psychology , political science , engineering , computer science , economics , law , ecology , linguistics , philosophy , mathematics , macroeconomics , combinatorics , database , biology
In academia, scholarship and research productivity is the lifeblood of success. The question is, “What is the best way to be productive and more forward in an academic career — collaboration or individualism?” Obviously, the final choice is personal. However, for the purpose of this paper, the two sides will be discussed regarding the strengths and weaknesses of each avenue. Recommendations regarding the viability of collaboration and competition will be discussed in relation to personal attributes, career goals, and rank. In addition, a new methodology, tentatively called Layered Narrative, will be piloted with this project.