Open AccessOphthalmology for the Myopic Methodologist: A Review of Five Ways of Doing Qualitative Analysis
Author(s) -
Carl Root
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
the qualitative report
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.335
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2160-3715
DOI - 10.46743/2160-3715/2011.1328
Subject(s) - reflexivity , narrative , grounded theory , interpretative phenomenological analysis , qualitative research , narrative inquiry , qualitative analysis , strengths and weaknesses , epistemology , psychology , sociology , social psychology , philosophy , social science , linguistics
In Five Ways of Doing Qualitative Analysis, Frederick J. Wertz, Kathy Charmaz, Linda M. McMullen, Ruthellen Josselson, and Rosemarie Anderson provide students and researchers with both a broad knowledge base and specific examples of each of their preferred methods of analysis. The authors apply their respective expertise of phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry to sixth author Emalinda McSpadden's narrative of responding to an unfortunate situation. The result is a comprehensive comparison of each method emphasizing unique strengths and weaknesses in each approach as well as the reflexivity required of researchers utilizing such analyses.