z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Do Research Thesis Examiners Need Training?: Practitioner Stories
Author(s) -
Shankar Sankaran,
Pam Swepson,
Geof Hill
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
˜the œqualitative report
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.335
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2160-3715
DOI - 10.46743/2160-3715/2005.1834
Subject(s) - storytelling , psychology , medical education , silence , pedagogy , sociology , narrative , medicine , aesthetics , art , literature
We are thesis examiners within the Australian academic system who formed a “community of practice” to try to resolve some of the issues we were facing. Stories of examiners reflecting on and examining their own practice are a notable silence in the higher degree research literature. In this study we have adopted a storytelling inquiry method that involved telling our practitioner stories, firstly to each other and then to a wider audience through this paper. We then identified issues that we believe are relevant to other thesis examiners. We have also found that engaging in a “community of practice” is itself a valuable form of examiner professional development.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here