
Measuring Intergroup Forgiveness: The Enright Group Forgiveness Inventory
Author(s) -
Robert D. Enright,
Julie Johnson,
Na Fu,
Tomaž Erzar,
Matthew S. Hirshberg,
Tina C. Huang,
John Klatt,
Chansoon Lee,
Benjamin Boateng,
Preston Boggs,
Tung-En Hsiao,
Chelsea Olson,
Mei Ling Shu,
Jacqueline Y. Song,
Peiying Wu,
Baoyu Zhang
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
peace and conflict studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.116
H-Index - 6
ISSN - 1082-7307
DOI - 10.46743/1082-7307/2020.1614
Subject(s) - forgiveness , psychology , social psychology , operationalization , conceptualization , group conflict , construct (python library) , discriminant validity , developmental psychology , internal consistency , psychometrics , philosophy , epistemology , artificial intelligence , computer science , programming language
Until recently, researchers operationalized and measured the psychological construct of forgiveness at the individual, rather than the group, level. Social psychologists started applying forgiveness to groups and examining the role intergroup forgiveness may have in conflict resolution and peace efforts. Initial attempts to define and measure forgiveness at the group level either assumed individual and group capacities were the same, or insufficiently described what intergroup forgiveness meant. We developed a new measure of intergroup forgiveness, and a novel group administration process, that operationalized the construct in a philosophically coherent way. Our conceptualization of intergroup forgiveness was rooted in what groups, as opposed to the individuals who compose them, have the capacity to do. We collected data on the psychometric properties of the measure with 595 participants in three different geographic and cultural settings. We assessed the factor structure, internal consistency, and validity of the measure. We also assessed a novel group-based method of administering the measure to better understand the relationship between group based reports and self-reports of intergroup forgiveness. The factor structure of the measure was supported, and the measure had strong internal consistency, as well as convergent and discriminant validity. The group administration process revealed important group dynamics and was not statistically different than a standard self-report administration; this finding has important implications for research and practice.