z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Manuel I Komnenos and Michael Glycas: A Twelfth-Century Defence and Refutation of Astrology
Author(s) -
Demetra George
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
culture and cosmos
Language(s) - English
DOI - 10.46472/cc.0106.0205
Subject(s) - astrology , emperor , byzantine architecture , philosophy , politics , liturgy , classics , literature , law , history , theology , ancient history , art , political science
Michael Glykas is generally known as a learned conservative theologian who wrote a refutation of Byzantine Emperor Manuel Komnenos' defence of astrology in the latter half of the twelfth century. However there exists substantial evidence that Michael Glykas had a dual identity as the shadowy Michael Sikidites who in his youth was known for his occult interests, suspected of political sedition against Manuel, and imprisoned and blinded as punishment for sorcery. With skill and critical astuteness, Glykas directs his refutation not so much against Manuel's philosophical arguments as against the claims of his evidence, and thus seeks to cast doubt upon the moral and literary integrity of his Emperor in an attempt to redeem his own reputation. Within half a century of the reintroduction of astrology to the West, Glykas was the first person in many centuries to stir up all the old Christian objections against the fatalism of the stars.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here