Open AccessThe role of the constitutional complaint in the legislative process: Comparative legal aspect
Author(s) -
Nataliia Brovko,
Людмила Петрівна Медвідь,
Ihor Y. Mahnovskyi,
Vusal Ahmadov,
Maksym I. Leonenko
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
cuestiones políticas/cuestiones políticas
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2542-3185
pISSN - 0798-1406
DOI - 10.46398/cuestpol.3969.51
Subject(s) - complaint , statute , legislation , law , constitution , constitutional right , duty , political science , state (computer science) , constitutional review , legislature , government (linguistics) , business , computer science , linguistics , philosophy , algorithm
The article deals with the role of constitutional complaint in the system of quality assurance of the state legislation, for protection of the rights and freedoms. Constitutional complaints, as well as their optimal models, require detailed research. Comparative analysis and survey are the main methods. The subject of a constitutional complaint in the model proposed by the authors may be laws or their individual provisions, regulations of heads of state, government, other statutes and regulations, individual administrative acts, judgements in specific cases. Citizens, foreigners, stateless persons, and legal entities are subjects who have the right to file a constitutional complaint. The authors attribute the following conditions of admissibility of a constitutional complaint: the presence and proof of violation of his/its constitutional rights and freedoms, the use of all other remedies to protect violated rights and freedoms, compliance with deadlines for filing a constitutional complaint in some countries, and payment of state duty. The model proposed by the authors is, however, universal, and further needs to be detailed for countries of interest.