Open AccessRole of principles of law from the perspective of legal impact in modern Russia: theoretical and technical-legal aspects
Author(s) -
Gyulnaz Eldarovna Adygezalova,
I.S. Kich,
Sergey Alekseevich Zhinkin,
Susanna Vladimirovna Salikova,
Neonila Dmitrievna Paltseva
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
cuestiones políticas/cuestiones políticas
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2542-3185
pISSN - 0798-1406
DOI - 10.46398/cuestpol.3968.52
Subject(s) - legislation , standardization , doctrine , law , context (archaeology) , perspective (graphical) , legal doctrine , legal science , political science , work (physics) , empirical legal studies , law and economics , engineering ethics , legal research , sociology , computer science , engineering , mechanical engineering , paleontology , artificial intelligence , biology
The article discusses the problems related to the implementation of the legal impact on modern Russia and the role of the principles of law as the underlying idea behind that impact. This research aims to structure visions of the main characteristics and classifications of the principles of law in the context of their formalization. The authors use the method of technical analysis of regulations, which is important to meet the requirements of legal engineering. As a result of the work carried out, the authors suggest that, on the one hand, it is important to aim at the standardization of the principles of law as accurately and accurately as possible in legislation. On the other hand, they assume that principles that are already assured in legislation but have not yet been recognized by the scientific community must also obtain an assessment and justified characteristics in the doctrine. They conclude that, from a technical-legal point of view, a principle of law that is not scientifically recognized does not disappear from the legal framework if it is institutionalized as such in effective legislation. On the contrary, essentially new principles enshrined in legislation should not be ignored by legal science.