Open AccessConnecting Gender Identity and Freedom of Conscience in Recent Romanian Constitutional Case-Law
Author(s) -
Mihail Stănescu-Sas
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
bratislava law review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2644-6359
pISSN - 2585-7088
DOI - 10.46282/blr.2021.5.2.236
Subject(s) - conscience , plural , freedom of thought , conviction , identity (music) , law , political science , democracy , freedom of religion , constitutional right , sociology , human rights , supreme court , philosophy , politics , linguistics , aesthetics
The Constitutional Court of Romania has recently ruled unconstitutional a new provision amending the Law regarding national education, meant to prohibit “any activity of disseminating the theory or opinion of gender identity, understood as the theory or opinion that gender is a concept different from biologic sex and that the two are not always the same”. This provision was found in breach of several constitutional principles, including freedom of conscience and freedom of expression. This decision makes for a brief ingression into the legal nature of gender identity and that of freedom of conscience, allowing for the former to serve as a means to clarifying the scope of application of the latter. Since gender identity recognition is not a “world view”, but a reflection of diversity which is integral to a plural, democratic society, the only way the said provision breached freedom of conscience involved its interior dimension: the freedom of thought of pupils and students. But it did not even involve an interference with the right to manifest a “conviction”, as far as pupils, students and also teachers are concerned. Nonetheless, it breached their freedom of expression.