z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Statutory Justifications of Torts in the Public Finance Discipline Introduced by the Provisions of Anti-Criris Shield – Analysis and De Lega Ferenda Postulates
Author(s) -
Ewaryst Kowalczyk
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
financial law review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2299-6834
DOI - 10.4467/22996834flr.22.008.15658
Subject(s) - statutory law , law , liability , tort , political science , order (exchange) , law and economics , business , economics , finance
The statutory concept of justification in public finance discipline comes down to clear exclusion of unlawfulness of discipline’s tort. It is assumed that the reason for the existence of justification of torts is a collision of interests and resulting from it, the necessity to indicate the interest excluding unlawfulness, and later waiving liability for breaching law. Justification behavior refers to actions which in typical situations are incorrect and unwanted, but because of special circumstances may constitute justification and hence need to be tolerated, accepted or even approved in the legal order. Regulations shaping the new premises excluding liability for breaching public finance discipline in connection with COVID-19 are included in legal regulations included in so called Anti-Crisis Shield. The aim of the study is to analyze the established legal solutions and to formulate de lege ferenda postulates.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here