Premium
Multiple approaches to estimating air‐water gas exchange in small lakes
Author(s) -
Cole Jonathan J,
Bade Darren L.,
Bastviken David,
Pace Michael L.,
Van de Bogert Matthew
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
limnology and oceanography: methods
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.898
H-Index - 72
ISSN - 1541-5856
DOI - 10.4319/lom.2010.8.285
Subject(s) - wind speed , environmental science , atmosphere (unit) , hydrology (agriculture) , meteorology , turbulence , water mass , energy exchange , series (stratigraphy) , piston (optics) , atmospheric sciences , physics , geology , oceanography , paleontology , geotechnical engineering , wavefront , optics
The rate of gas exchange between air and water is an essential quantity in a number of contexts, from mass balances to the calculation of whole‐system metabolism. The exchange of a gas between water and the atmosphere is controlled by differential partial pressures of gases in air and in water (both straightforward to measure) and by the amount of turbulent energy exchange between the air‐water interface, the measurement of which is neither simple nor direct. This physical exchange is often expressed as a piston velocity (k). We compared four methods for estimating k in a series of small (0.3 to 45 ha), low‐wind (mean wind < 3 m s −1 ) lakes: 1) floating chambers using ambient CH 4 ; 2) whole‐lake SF 6 additions; 3) three wind‐based models from the literature; and 4) C mass balances constrained by whole‐lake 13 C additions. All of the methods, with the exception of one wind‐based model, converged on values for k 600 of between 0.35 and 0.74 m d −1 with no biases among methods. The floating chambers, if designed properly, are a cost‐effective way of obtaining site‐specific values of k for low wind lakes over fairly short time frames (hours).