Premium
The effect of CO 2 on the photosynthetic physiology of phytoplankton in the Gulf of Alaska
Author(s) -
Hopkinson Brian M.,
Xu Yan,
Shi Dalin,
McGinn Patrick J.,
Morel François M. M.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
limnology and oceanography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.7
H-Index - 197
eISSN - 1939-5590
pISSN - 0024-3590
DOI - 10.4319/lo.2010.55.5.2011
Subject(s) - photosynthesis , phytoplankton , biomass (ecology) , microcosm , acclimatization , respiration , nutrient , chlorophyll a , chlorophyll , biology , photosynthetic efficiency , zoology , environmental chemistry , chemistry , botany , ecology
In the high‐nutrient, low‐chlorophyll waters of the Gulf of Alaska, microcosm manipulation experiments were used to assess the effect of CO 2 on growth and primary production under iron‐limited and iron‐replete conditions. As expected, iron had a strong effect on growth and photosynthesis. A modest and variable stimulation of growth and biomass production by CO 2 (high CO 2 : 77–122 Pa; low CO 2 : 11‐17 Pa) was observed under both iron‐replete and iron‐limited conditions, though near the limit of precision of our measurements in slow‐growing low‐iron experiments. Physiological acclimations responsible for the changes in growth were assessed. Under iron‐limited conditions, growth stimulation at high CO 2 appeared to result from an increase in photosynthetic efficiency, which we attribute to energy savings from down‐regulation of the carbon concentrating mechanisms. In some cases, iron‐rich photosynthetic proteins (PsbA, PsaC, and cytochrome b 6 ) were down‐regulated at elevated CO 2 in iron‐limited controls. Under iron‐replete conditions, there was an increase in growth rate and biomass at high CO 2 in some experiments. This increase was unexpectedly supported by reductions in cellular carbon loss, most likely decreased respiration. We speculate that this effect may be due to acclimation to decreased pH rather than high CO 2 . The variability in responses to CO 2 among experiments did not appear to be caused by differences in phytoplankton community structure and may reflect the sensitivity of the net response of phytoplankton to antagonistic effects of the several parameters that co‐vary with CO 2 .