z-logo
Premium
Reach‐scale isotope tracer experiment to quantify denitrification and related processes in a nitrate‐rich stream, midcontinent United States
Author(s) -
Böhlke John Karl,
Harvey Judson W.,
Voytek Mary A.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
limnology and oceanography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.7
H-Index - 197
eISSN - 1939-5590
pISSN - 0024-3590
DOI - 10.4319/lo.2004.49.3.0821
Subject(s) - denitrification , tracer , nitrate , nitrification , groundwater , environmental science , hydrology (agriculture) , environmental chemistry , chemistry , nitrogen cycle , nitrogen , geology , physics , geotechnical engineering , organic chemistry , nuclear physics
We conducted an in‐stream tracer experiment with Br and 15 N‐enriched NO 3 − to determine the rates of denitrification and related processes in a gaining NO 3 − ‐rich stream in an agricultural watershed in the upper Mississippi basin in September 2001. We determined reach‐averaged rates of N fluxes and reactions from isotopic analyses of NO 3 − , NO 2 − , N 2 , and suspended particulate N in conjunction with other data in a 1.2‐km reach by using a forward time‐stepping numerical simulation that included groundwater discharge, denitrification, nitrification, assimilation, and air‐water gas exchange with changing temperature. Denitrification was indicated by a systematic downstream increase in the δ 15 N values of dissolved N 2 . The reach‐averaged rate of denitrification of surface‐water NO 3 − indicated by the isotope tracer was approximately 120 ± 20 µmol m −2 h −1 (corresponding to zero‐ and first‐order rate constants of 0.63 µmol L −1 h −1 and 0.009 h −1 , respectively). The overall rate of NO 3 − loss by processes other than denitrification (between 0 and about 200 µmol m −2 h −1 ) probably was less than the denitrification rate but had a large relative uncertainty because the NO 3 − load was large and was increasing through the reach. The rates of denitrification and other losses would have been sufficient to reduce the stream NO 3 − load substantially in the absence of NO 3 − sources, but the losses were more than offset by nitrification and groundwater NO 3 − inputs at a combined rate of about 500‐700 µmol m −2 h −1 . Despite the importance of denitrification, the overall mass fluxes of N 2 were dominated by discharge of denitrified groundwater and air‐water gas exchange in response to changing temperature, whereas the flux of N 2 attributed to denitrification was relatively small. The in‐stream isotope tracer experiment provided a sensitive direct reach‐scale measurement of denitrification and related processes in a NO 3 − ‐rich stream where other mass‐balance methods were not suitable because of insufficient sensitivity or offsetting sources and sinks. Despite the increasing NO 3 − load in the experimental reach, the isotope tracer data indicate that denitrification was a substantial permanent sink for N leaving this agricultural watershed during low‐flow conditions.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom