Premium
Evaluating the influence of macrophytes on algal and bacterial production in multiple habitats of a freshwater wetland
Author(s) -
Stanley Emily H.,
Johnson Mark D.,
Ward Amelia K.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
limnology and oceanography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.7
H-Index - 197
eISSN - 1939-5590
pISSN - 0024-3590
DOI - 10.4319/lo.2003.48.3.1101
Subject(s) - macrophyte , wetland , habitat , environmental science , ecology , aquatic plant , production (economics) , biology , economics , macroeconomics
Algal 14 C uptake and bacterial 3 H leucine incorporation were measured over 20 months to assess the influence of macrophytes on the spatial distribution and magnitude of microbial production and the relative importance of algae versus macrophytes to whole‐system energy flow in a southeastern U.S. wetland. Algal and bacterial production were determined for water column and plant‐, sediment‐, and wood‐surface microhabitats in four zones defined by aquatic vascular plant composition: no macrophyte, floating leaved ( Nymphaea odorata ), heterophyllous ( Proserpinaca palustris ), or emergent macrophyte ( Juncus effusus ) zones. We combined production data with detailed habitat measurements to estimate production at meter‐squared and whole‐wetland scales and compared microbial C fixation to concurrently determined rates of macrophyte production. Production on plant surfaces was significantly lower than on wood and benthic sediments in all zones. At a meter‐squared scale, 79% of algal production and 74% of bacterial production occurred on sediments, with epiphytes contributing ,6% to both algal and bacterial rates. With the exception of phytoplankton in the Nymphaea zone and bacteria on Juncus zone sediments, production in the water column or on plant or sediment surfaces did not significantly differ among macrophyte zones. Thus, plant type did not affect the spatial distribution of microbial activity except in the Juncus marsh, where the limited area and volume of water per square meter reduced production at larger spatial scales. However, the magnitude of bacterial production was influenced by macrophytes, as bacterial carbon demand greatly exceeded the amount supplied by algal production. At the whole‐ecosystem scale, macrophytes overwhelmed algal production, which accounted for only 4–10% of total wetland C fixation.