z-logo
Premium
Reach‐scale manipulations show invertebrate grazers depress algal resources in streams
Author(s) -
Taylor Brad W.,
McIntosh Angus R.,
Peckarsky Barbara L.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
limnology and oceanography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.7
H-Index - 197
eISSN - 1939-5590
pISSN - 0024-3590
DOI - 10.4319/lo.2002.47.3.0893
Subject(s) - microcosm , invertebrate , periphyton , streams , biomass (ecology) , ecology , algal mat , algae , environmental science , spatial ecology , abundance (ecology) , biology , computer network , computer science
Experimental tools that enable manipulations of organisms at larger scales allow for comparisons of processes across multiple spatial scales and expand our ability to make predictions about ecological processes. We performed reach scale (i.e., 50 m 2 ) manipulations of invertebrate communities in streams using a modified electroshocking technique to nondestructively remove invertebrates. In addition, we conducted a microcosm experiment (i.e., 157 cm 2 ) with different grazer densities that enabled comparison of the strength of grazer‐algal interactions at large and small spatial scales. In high elevation headwater streams, electroshocking reduced total invertebrate abundance by 84% in a 50‐m 2 reach of stream. Although mobile invertebrates recolonized the manipulated area rapidly, daily electroshocking maintained the density reduction. Electroshocking reduced the density of herbivorous invertebrates 86%, which resulted in a 57% increase in algal biomass, whereas in a stream that was not electroshocked, invertebrate density and algal biomass changed much less, only 16 and 8%, respectively. Comparison of grazer effect on periphyton between microcosm and reach‐scale experiments revealed that the per capita interaction strength of grazers on primary producers was three times greater in the reach‐scale manipulation than that observed in the microcosm experiments. Reach‐scale manipulation of invertebrate grazers in streams provides a powerful method to experimentally test patterns observed in the field at a large spatial scale, with more realism than streamside microcosms or small cages in streams.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here