z-logo
Premium
Carbon dioxide partial pressure and 13C content of north temperate and boreal lakes at spring ice melt
Author(s) -
Striegl Robert G.,
Kortelainen Pirkko,
Chanton Jeffrey P.,
Wickland Kimberly P.,
Bugna Glynnis C.,
Rantakari Miitta
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
limnology and oceanography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.7
H-Index - 197
eISSN - 1939-5590
pISSN - 0024-3590
DOI - 10.4319/lo.2001.46.4.0941
Subject(s) - carbon dioxide , temperate climate , atmosphere (unit) , peat , dissolved organic carbon , environmental science , boreal , oceanography , atmospheric sciences , environmental chemistry , hydrology (agriculture) , geology , chemistry , ecology , biology , paleontology , physics , geotechnical engineering , thermodynamics
Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) accumulates under lake ice in winter and degasses to the atmosphere after ice melt. This large springtime CO 2 pulse is not typically considered in surface‐atmosphere flux estimates, because most field studies have not sampled through ice during late winter. Measured CO 2 partial pressure (pCO 2 ) of lake surface water ranged from 8.6 to 4,290 Pa (85–4,230 µatm) in 234 north temperate and boreal lakes prior to ice melt during 1998 and 1999. Only four lakes had surface pCO 2 less than or equal to atmospheric pCO 2 , whereas 75% had pCO 2 >5 times atmospheric. The δ 13 C DIC (DIC = ΣCO 2 ) of 142 of the lakes ranged from –26.28‰ to +0.95‰. Lakes with the greatest pCO 2 also had the lightest δ 13 C DIC , which indicates respiration as their primary CO 2 source. Finnish lakes that received large amounts of dissolved organic carbon from surrounding peatlands had the greatest pCO 2 . Lakes set in noncarbonate till and bedrock in Minnesota and Wisconsin had the smallest pCO 2 and the heaviest d 13 C DIC , which indicates atmospheric and/or mineral sources of C for those lakes. Potential emissions for the period after ice melt were 2.36 ± 1.44 mol CO 2 m −2 for lakes with average pCO 2 values and were as large as 13.7 ± 8.4 mol CO 2 m −2 for lakes with high pCO 2 values.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here