Premium
Estimating the impact of fungal parasites on phytoplankton populations
Author(s) -
Bruning Kees,
Lingeman Rob,
Ringelberg Joop
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
limnology and oceanography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.7
H-Index - 197
eISSN - 1939-5590
pISSN - 0024-3590
DOI - 10.4319/lo.1992.37.2.0252
Subject(s) - biology , parasitism , diatom , host (biology) , population , phytoplankton , parasite hosting , bloom , sporangium , ecology , spore , zoology , botany , nutrient , demography , sociology , world wide web , computer science
A population‐dynamic model is formulated to estimate the impact of chytrid and related fungal parasites on phytoplankton populations. The specific loss rate of uninfected host cells due to infection is used as a measure of the impact. Calculating this loss rate requires information about four parameters: prevalence of infection (i.e. the proportion of the host cells infected), development time of the sporangia of the parasite, specific growth rate of the uninfected host, and difference between loss rates of infected and uninfected host cells due to loss factors other than parasitism. When only cell counts of the host population are available instead of growth and loss rate values, the model can be used to calculate a minimum estimate of the impact of the parasite. The impact of the parasite at a given prevalence of infection can vary considerably as a consequence of environmental effects on the latter three parameters. Therefore, prevalence is not a good parameter to judge the severity of fungal epidemics. A phytoplankton population starts to decline when prevalence exceeds a certain threshold value. This critical prevalence of infection can be calculated with the model and is also highly dependent on external conditions. The model is applied to epidemics of the chytrid Rhizophydium planktonicum Canter emend. in a population of the diatom Asterionella formosa Hass. in Lake Maarsseveen 1. The end of both the spring and summer 1984 bloom of the diatom was caused by epidemics of the chytrid. Model results suggested also that higher sinking rates, caused by an increasing proportion of dead cells in the colonies, resulted in an additional loss factor due to parasitism for this colonial diatom.