z-logo
Premium
Alkalinity and major ion budgets for a Massachusetts reservoir and watershed 1
Author(s) -
Eshleman Keith N.,
Hemond Harold F.
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
limnology and oceanography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.7
H-Index - 197
eISSN - 1939-5590
pISSN - 0024-3590
DOI - 10.4319/lo.1988.33.2.0174
Subject(s) - alkalinity , throughfall , biogeochemical cycle , weathering , deposition (geology) , watershed , acid rain , environmental chemistry , sulfur , hydrology (agriculture) , environmental science , chemistry , acid neutralizing capacity , biogeochemistry , sink (geography) , acid deposition , sediment , soil water , soil science , geology , geochemistry , paleontology , geotechnical engineering , cartography , organic chemistry , machine learning , computer science , geography
A detailed field study of the major ion and alkalinity budgets of Bickford Reservoir and its forested watershed in Massachusetts was conducted to quantify the hydrochemical response of the ecosystem to acid deposition. Three years of alkalinity data from this oligotrophic reservoir exhibit repeating seasonal variability but no clear trend. The annual acid‐base status of the system is predominantly determined by the following terrestrial biogeochemical processes: wet and dry acidic deposition, production of base cations by mineral weathering or cation exchange, biological retention of HNO 3 , and production of natural humic substances. Although HNO 3 deposition was completely neutralized by biological retention, measured bulk SO 4 2− deposition could account for only about 50% of streamwater SO 4 2− output; dry sulfur deposition estimated from throughfall enrichment accounts for an additional 40%. Monthly budgets show a strong seasonal SO 4 2− sink in summer, but estimation of the magnitude of net biotic SO 4 2− removal is confounded by evidence that the weathering of sulfur‐containing minerals is significant. Watershed budgets suggest that increased sulfur deposition may cause a decrease in surface water alkalinity—possibly on an equivalent for equivalent basis—unless SO 4 2− reduction and base cation supply increase accordingly.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here