z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Mandibular advancement devices vs nasal-continuous positive airway pressure in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea. Systematic review and meta-analysis
Author(s) -
Giovanni Cammaroto,
Cosimo Galletti,
Francesco Galletti,
Bruno Galletti,
Cosimo Galletti,
Cosme GayEscoda
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.644
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1698-6946
pISSN - 1698-4447
DOI - 10.4317/medoral.21671
Subject(s) - medicine , continuous positive airway pressure , gold standard (test) , meta analysis , airway , population , epworth sleepiness scale , positive airway pressure , polysomnography , obstructive sleep apnea , anesthesia , apnea , environmental health
Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common disorder that may affect at least 2 to 4% of the adult population. Nasal-Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (N-CPAP) is today considered the gold standard for the treatment of OSA. The development of oral appliances (OAs) represents a new approach for the management of this pathology. The aim of this systematic review is to compare the efficacy of OAs and N-CPAP in the treatment of patients with mild to severe OSA.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here