Open AccessConspicuous Absence of Independent Judiciary and ‘Apolitical’ Courts in Modern Ethiopia
Author(s) -
Simeneh Kiros Assefa
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
mizan law review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2309-902X
pISSN - 1998-9881
DOI - 10.4314/mlr.v15i2.3
Subject(s) - law , political science , legislation , democracy , settlement (finance) , power (physics) , administration (probate law) , politics , separation of powers , government (linguistics) , public administration , economics , linguistics , philosophy , physics , finance , quantum mechanics , payment
Ethiopia had revolutions in 1974 and 1991, after which the Provisional Military Administration Council (‘PMAC’) and Ethiopian Peoples’ Revolutionary Democratic Front (‘EPRDF’) governments came to power, respectively. Each incoming government re-established and re-structured the courts. Likewise, criminal jurisdictions of the courts and the rules of appointment of judges and court personnel were changed. Yet, the governments presented the courts as independent, insulated from political interference. After examining the respective legislation and the decisions of two sets of courts, I argue that Ethiopia never had an independent judiciary; there were courts established for dispute settlement for the ordinary citizen. The courts were not as apolitical as claimed by the respective governments. They have been, often, compliant with the interests of the regime of the day by giving effect to the executive’s excesses of power or by creating enabling conditions, as though they were extension of the executive.