z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
How Applicable is the Idea of Deep Ecology in the African Context?
Author(s) -
Fainos Mangena
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
deleted journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.269
H-Index - 7
ISSN - 2408-5987
DOI - 10.4314/ft.v4i1.1
Subject(s) - deep ecology , anthropocentrism , ecology , context (archaeology) , shona , human ecology , systems ecology , sociology , environmental ethics , geography , applied ecology , biology , philosophy , plant ecology , archaeology , linguistics
In this paper, I outlined and discussed the idea of deep ecology as defended by Arne Næss (1973) as well as Bill Devall and George Sessions (1985). I especially looked at how deep ecology has responded to the dominant view in ecological ethics, especially its attendant theory – anthropocentrism or homo-centrism or simply the reason-based account – which I outlined and explained in the first section of this paper. In the final analysis, I looked at the feasibility (or lack thereof) of applying deep ecology in Sub-Saharan African ecological contexts focusing particularly on the Shona ecological matrix of Zimbabwe. My intention was to answer the question: How applicable is the idea of deep ecology in the African context? Having reviewed Zimbabwean literature, I came to the conclusion that the Shona enviro nment had a different form of deep ecology that was not only anchored on spirituality but that it also interpreted cosmology and ecology from a communitarian viewpoint.Keywords: Deep ecology, the dominant view, anthropocentrism, spirituality, the human world, the non-human world

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom