Diversifying Academic Philosophy
Author(s) -
Vytis Silius
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
asian studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.23
H-Index - 5
eISSN - 2350-4226
pISSN - 2232-5131
DOI - 10.4312/as.2020.8.2.257-280
Subject(s) - philosophy education , western philosophy , parochialism , philosophy of sport , philosophy of computer science , epistemology , philosophy of medicine , modern philosophy , community of inquiry , curriculum , social philosophy , field (mathematics) , philosophy of science , sociology , social science , philosophy , political science , pedagogy , law , psychology , neuroscience , cognition , alternative medicine , mathematics , medicine , pure mathematics , social relation , politics , pathology
The article asks why, in Western universities, the success of the academic field of comparative philosophy has so far failed to significantly diversify the curricula of academic philosophy. It suggests that comparative philosophy has mainly relied on the same approaches that have made academic philosophy Eurocentric, namely, on the history of philosophy as the main mode of teaching and researching philosophy. Further, post-comparative philosophy and transcultural studies are presented as providing tools to address the foundations of the institutional parochialism of academic philosophy, while preserving one of the most fundamental tenets of philosophy—the quest for universal knowledge that transcends cultural particularities.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom