Premium
Pass or Run: An Empirical Test of the Matching Pennies Game Using Data from the National Football League
Author(s) -
McGarrity Joseph P.,
Linnen Brian
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
southern economic journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.762
H-Index - 58
eISSN - 2325-8012
pISSN - 0038-4038
DOI - 10.4284/sej.2010.76.3.791
Subject(s) - league , football , backup , test (biology) , matching (statistics) , action (physics) , computer science , computer security , operations research , econometrics , economics , political science , statistics , engineering , law , mathematics , astronomy , paleontology , physics , quantum mechanics , database , biology
This article examines play calling in the National Football League (NFL). It finds that a mixed strategy equilibrium game explains NFL play calling better than standard optimization techniques. When a quarterback is injured and replaced with a less capable backup, standard optimization theory suggests that the offense will run more often, passing less. Our game theoretic model predicts that the offense will not change its play calling because the defense will play against the run more often. Using every first half play from the 11 teams that had a starting quarterback miss action because of injury in the 2006 season, we find that the injury did not alter the likelihood that the offense would pass. We also find that coaches randomly mix passing and running plays, as the mixed strategy games predict.