z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Outcomes research in gastroenterology and endoscopy
Author(s) -
Parantap Gupta,
Jonathan M. Buscaglia
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
world journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1948-5190
DOI - 10.4253/wjge.v4.i6.236
Subject(s) - medicine , confusion , outcomes research , endoscopy , medline , gastroenterology , medical physics , alternative medicine , pathology , psychology , political science , psychoanalysis , law
Although the field of outcomes research has received increased attention in recent years, there is still considerable uncertainty and confusion about what is "outcomes research". The following editorial is designed to provide an overview on this topic, illustrate specific examples of outcomes research in clinical gastroenterology and endoscopy, and discuss its importance as a whole. In this article, we review the definition and specific goals of outcomes research. We outline the difference between traditional clinical research and outcomes research and discuss the benefits and limitations of outcomes research. We summarize the types of outcomes studies and methods utilized for outcomes assessment, and give specific examples of the impact of outcomes studies in the field of gastroenterology and endoscopy.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here