z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Relevance of Evidence from the History of Science in the Contemporary Realism/Anti-realism Debate
Author(s) -
K. Brad Wray
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
spontaneous generations
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1913-0465
DOI - 10.4245/sponge.v9i1.26986
Subject(s) - realism , relevance (law) , epistemology , history of science , critical realism (philosophy of perception) , philosophy , political science , law
It is widely assumed that it is the anti-realist who stakes his case on evidence from the history of science. I argue that (i) realists have failed to recognize the need to collect evidence from the history of science to support their methodological claims, and (ii) anti-realists do not rely on evidence from the history of science to the extent that many suggest.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here