z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Direct Mechanisms, Menus and Latent Contracts
Author(s) -
Gwenaёl Piaser
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
modern economy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2152-7245
pISSN - 2152-7261
DOI - 10.4236/me.2010.11005
Subject(s) - incentive , computer science , class (philosophy) , agency (philosophy) , risk analysis (engineering) , microeconomics , mathematical economics , economics , business , artificial intelligence , epistemology , philosophy
In common agency games, one cannot characterize all equilibria by considering only direct mechanisms. In an attempt to overcome this difficulty, Peters [Econometrica, 2001]and Martimort and Stole [Econometrica, 2002] identified a class of indirect mechanisms (namely, menus) which are able to characterize every equilibrium. Unfortunately, menus are difficult to handle, and several methodologies have been proposed in the literature. Here, it is shown that, even if authors consider menus rather than simpler mechanisms, many equilibria described in the literature could have been characterized by direct incentive compatible mechanisms. Use of more sophisticated mechanisms was not necessary in these cases.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here