Testing gustatory function using either a forced-choice or a non-forced-choice paradigm - Does it make a difference? | Zendy

Gerold Besser | Zendy; A. Prassl | Zendy; Christian A. Mueller | Zendy; Bertold Renner | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Testing gustatory function using either a forced-choice or a non-forced-choice paradigm - Does it make a difference?

Author(s) -

Gerold Besser,

A. Prassl,

Christian A. Mueller,

Bertold Renner

Publication year - 2019

Publication title -

rhinology journal

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.275

H-Index - 57

eISSN - 1996-8604

pISSN - 0300-0729

DOI - 10.4193/rhin19.021

Subject(s) - taste , two alternative forced choice , medicine , bitter taste , perception , audiology , modalities , taste disorder , cognitive psychology , psychology , neuroscience , social science , sociology

Recently more interest is evolving for research on gustatory function, also due to findings of â€extraoralâ€ taste receptors with postulated participation in a pathogen detection network. Also, bitter taste function seems to be reduced in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. For testing gustatory function â€taste stripsâ€ (TS) have been validated in a forced-choice (fc) and a non-forced-choice (nfc) paradigm and used in several studies. Purpose of the investigation was to evaluate possible differences of named modalities.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research