z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Testing gustatory function using either a forced-choice or a non-forced-choice paradigm - Does it make a difference?
Author(s) -
Gerold Besser,
A. Prassl,
Christian A. Mueller,
Bertold Renner
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
rhinology (amsterdam. online)/rhinology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.275
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1996-8604
pISSN - 0300-0729
DOI - 10.4193/rhin19.021
Subject(s) - taste , two alternative forced choice , medicine , bitter taste , perception , audiology , modalities , taste disorder , cognitive psychology , psychology , neuroscience , social science , sociology
Recently more interest is evolving for research on gustatory function, also due to findings of â€extraoral†taste receptors with postulated participation in a pathogen detection network. Also, bitter taste function seems to be reduced in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. For testing gustatory function â€taste strips†(TS) have been validated in a forced-choice (fc) and a non-forced-choice (nfc) paradigm and used in several studies. Purpose of the investigation was to evaluate possible differences of named modalities.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here