z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Measures of agreement
Author(s) -
Priya Ranganathan,
C S Pramesh,
Rakesh Aggarwal
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
perspectives in clinical research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.649
H-Index - 8
eISSN - 2229-5488
pISSN - 2229-3485
DOI - 10.4103/picr.picr_123_17
Subject(s) - concordance , statistics , agreement , statistical analysis , correlation , statistical hypothesis testing , econometrics , variable (mathematics) , mathematics , computer science , data mining , medicine , linguistics , philosophy , geometry , mathematical analysis
Agreement between measurements refers to the degree of concordance between two (or more) sets of measurements. Statistical methods to test agreement are used to assess inter-rater variability or to decide whether one technique for measuring a variable can substitute another. In this article, we look at statistical measures of agreement for different types of data and discuss the differences between these and those for assessing correlation.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here