z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of effectiveness of quad helix appliance with other slow maxillary expanders in children with posterior crossbite: A systematic review
Author(s) -
Khyaati Vinod Gidwani,
Vikas Bendgude,
Vivian V Kokkali,
Vini Mehta
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of the indian society of pedodontics and preventive dentistry/journal of indian society of pedodontics and preventive dentistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.378
H-Index - 33
eISSN - 1998-3905
pISSN - 0970-4388
DOI - 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_85_17
Subject(s) - medicine , randomized controlled trial , dentistry , clinical trial , inclusion and exclusion criteria , crossbite , orthodontics , medline , malocclusion , surgery , alternative medicine , pathology , political science , law
The present review was conducted to compare the effectiveness of Quad Helix (QH) appliance with other slow maxillary expanders in children with posterior crossbite.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here