z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Factors Accountable for Unabated Obstruction Following Pyeloplasty
Author(s) -
Uday Sankar Chatterjee,
Ashoke Kumar Basu,
Debashis Mitra,
Subir K. Chatterjee
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of indian association of pediatric surgeons
Language(s) - Uncategorized
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.306
H-Index - 17
eISSN - 1998-3891
pISSN - 0971-9261
DOI - 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_202_19
Subject(s) - medicine , pyeloplasty , stent , renal function , surgery , kidney , restenosis , urology , hydronephrosis , urinary system
Split renal function (SFR) and frusemide washout (FWO) are assessed by the DTPA renogram to measure the renal parenchymal functions as well as the evidence of obstruction, both for diagnosis and to treat the pelviureteric junction obstruction. In good number of renal units, both these parameters remain unaltered even after surgery and cause anguish to parents and referring physicians and are usually attributed toward "defective pyeloplasty." In this study, we have tried to single out the bona fide responsible factor for the bad outcome; either the nonreversible kidney or the restenosis of pyeloplasty.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here