z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Cost-utility analysis of Macitentan Vs. Bosentan in pulmonary atrial hypertension
Author(s) -
Marzieh Nosrati,
Nikinaz Ashrafi Shahmirzadi,
Mohammad H. Afzali,
Pardis Zaboli,
Hasti Rouhani,
Haleh Hamedifar,
Mirhamed Hajimiri
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of family medicine and primary care
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2278-7135
pISSN - 2249-4863
DOI - 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1166_19
Subject(s) - bosentan , medicine , cardiology , liberian dollar , intensive care medicine , endothelin receptor , finance , receptor , economics
Endothelin (ET) receptor antagonists (ERAs) have considerable improvements in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients' symptoms. Macitentan, a novel ERA, has more significant positive effects like reduction of morbidity and mortality in PAH patients by 45% and decreases PAH hospitalization. Besides, macitentan was able to improve both the physical and mental aspects of patients' lives. This study aimed to evaluate an incremental cost-utility analysis of macitentan compared with bosentan in PAH patients in the Iranian health care system.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here