z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Who benefits more in osteoporotic fractures: Pedicle screw instrumentation or kyphoplasty for American Society of Anesthesiologists II/III patients?
Author(s) -
Tjark Tassemeier,
Marcel Haversath,
Moritz Schutzbach,
Markus Jäger
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of craniovertebral junction and spine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.38
H-Index - 23
eISSN - 0976-9285
pISSN - 0974-8237
DOI - 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_55_18
Subject(s) - medicine , surgery , kyphosis , perioperative , complication , orthopedic surgery , sagittal plane , american society of anesthesiologists , retrospective cohort study , radiography , radiology
Osteoporotc fractures with posterior wall injury are commonly treated with a pedicle srcrew instrumentation (PSI) or a ballonkyphoplasty (BKP). A predictor for complications for these patients is the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class. Clinical results in ASA II/III patients who underwent BKP and PSI due to OF were evaluated to find the optimal treatment regimen.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here