z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Platelet-rich fibrin or platelet-rich plasma – which one is better? an opinion
Author(s) -
Shweta Bansal,
Arun Garg,
Richa Khurana,
Parul Chhabra
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
indian journal of dental sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2231-2293
pISSN - 0976-4003
DOI - 10.4103/ijds.ijds_55_17
Subject(s) - fibrin , platelet rich fibrin , platelet , thrombin , platelet rich plasma , chemistry , microbiology and biotechnology , centrifugation , extracellular , regeneration (biology) , biomaterial , platelet concentrate , biomedical engineering , biochemistry , biophysics , immunology , medicine , biology
The healing of hard and soft tissue in mediated by a wide range of intracellular and extracellular events that are regulated by signaling proteins. Platelets can play a crucial role in periodontal regeneration as they are the reservoirs of growth factors and cytokines which are the key factors for regeneration of bone and maturation of soft tissue. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is first generation platelet concentrate. However, the short duration of cytokine release and its poor mechanical properties have resulted in search of new material. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) is a natural fibrin-based biomaterial prepared from an anticoagulant-free blood harvest without any artificial biochemical modification (no bovine thrombin is required) that allows obtaining fibrin membranes enriched with platelets and growth factors. The slow polymerization during centrifugation, fibrin-based structure, ease of preparation, minimal expense makes PRF somewhat superior in some aspect to PRP

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here