z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Dexmedetomidine–propofol vs ketamine–propofol anaesthesia in paediatric and young adult patients undergoing device closure procedures in cardiac catheterisation laboratory: An open label randomised trial
Author(s) -
Kunal Tewari,
Vishal Vishnu Tewari,
Subroto K Datta
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
indian journal of anaesthesia/indian journal of anaesthesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.645
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 0976-2817
pISSN - 0019-5049
DOI - 10.4103/ija.ija_692_17
Subject(s) - medicine , dexmedetomidine , propofol , ketamine , anesthesia , open label , cardiac catheterisation , randomized controlled trial , closure (psychology) , sedation , surgery , economics , market economy
Several drug combinations have been tried in patients with acyanotic congenital heart disease (ACHD) undergoing transcatheter device closure in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory (CCL). Adequate sedation, analgesia, akinesia, cardiorespiratory stability, and prompt recovery are key requirements. Ketamine with propofol is used for this purpose. Dexmedetomidine carries a shorter recovery time. This study compared dexmedetomidine-propofol (DP) with ketamine-propofol (KP) in patients in the CCL.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here