z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Long-term follow-up for patients with colonic perforation due to colonoscopy
Author(s) -
T.-C. Chen,
JiShiang Hung,
BeenRen Lin,
John Huang,
Jin–Tung Liang
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
formosan journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.135
H-Index - 8
eISSN - 2213-5413
pISSN - 1682-606X
DOI - 10.4103/fjs.fjs_81_17
Subject(s) - colonoscopy , viewpoints , perforation , medicine , term (time) , general surgery , colorectal cancer , engineering , art , physics , cancer , quantum mechanics , punching , visual arts , mechanical engineering
Background: This retrospective study analyzes the clinicopathologic features and medicolegal debates on this complication.Methods: There were 29 records of colonic perforations, whose charts were retrospectively reviewed.Results: A total of 26 perforations occurred as a result of diagnostic colonoscopy, and three occurred after therapeutic colonoscopy. Eight perforations were diagnosed immediately during the procedure, based on the revelation of intraperitoneal organs with bleeding of bowel wall on the colonoscopic monitor. Twenty patients were diagnosed as a hollow-organ perforation within 12 h after the completion of colonoscopy, whereas one perforation was found more than 24 h after colonoscopy. Abdominal pain and distention are the most common symptoms. All the patients underwent emergency surgery. One patient had wound infection, and two patients had leakage of the repair site. One patient aged 80 died of pulmonary septic complication. Our hospital paid all additional expenses which were not covered by the National Health Insurance Bureau for all patients, ranging from 500.0 to 1500.0 US dollars (mean ± standard deviation, 549.0 ± 145.0 US dollars). Four patients (13.8%) asked for further compensation of the complication and one litigated.Conclusions: Iatrogenic colonic perforation due to endoscopy is potentially lethal, especially for aged patients. Some patients and their family viewed the perforation as malpractice and asked for compensations. Usually, the primary repair of the perforation site is safe, and long-term follow-up reveals no sequelae after adequate treatment

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here