z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparative analysis of cost and efficacy for mono and dual therapy of antiepileptics among children
Author(s) -
Vigneshwaran Easwaran,
Monica Madineni,
Karunakar Sake,
Khaled Mohammed Alakhali,
Shaik Alavudeen Sirajudeen,
Noohu Abdullah Khan
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
drug development and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2394-6555
pISSN - 2394-2002
DOI - 10.4103/ddt.ddt_16_16
Subject(s) - dual (grammatical number) , medicine , psychology , philosophy , linguistics
Developing countries contribute to major number of patients living with epilepsy, around five million people are living with epilepsy in India alone. Most of the epileptic children may require multiple antiepileptic therapy due to the failure of monotherapy. Basic research evidence suggest that sodium valproate and carbamazepine (CBZ) may have synergistic anticonvulsant effects when they are used together. In addition to that, chronic disorders make the patients economically weak and produce more burden. Aim and Objective: Therefore, this study was designed to compare the efficacy of valproate monotherapy with valproate and CBZ dual therapy. Methodology: It is a prospective, comparative study conducted at a secondary care referral hospital and private clinic. A nonprobabilistic convenient sampling was done to recruit the study subjects. A total of fifty subjects were recruited into the present study, and they were divided into two groups, i.e., monotherapy group (CBZ) and dual therapy group (CBZ and valproate). After providing appropriate counseling, subjects were interviewed to estimate the quality of life (QOL) using child version of TNO-AZL Children's Quality of Life questionnaire. Hospital patient records, prescription data from the pharmacy were also used to obtain the direct and indirect cost of treatment. Results: Our study results showed that monotherapy has a potential to produce a higher level of QOL than dual therapy. It also involved with decreased seizure frequency. Although there was no statistically significant difference in terms of cost for both the treatment groups, still dual therapy is associated with higher cost burden. The average costs per QOL and changes in the frequency of seizure are also identified to produce higher economic burden to the patients.Conclusion: Thus, the present study has concluded that monotherapy may be considered as better cost-effective treatment in partial seizures than dual therapy, unless if there is no treatment failure with monotherapy

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here