Comparison of videolaryngoscope and intubating laryngeal mask airway for tracheal intubation with manual-in-line stabilization in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery | Zendy

Shipra Aggarwal | Zendy; Reena Jakhar | Zendy; Deepti Saigal | Zendy; Suniti Kale | Zendy

Open Access

Comparison of videolaryngoscope and intubating laryngeal mask airway for tracheal intubation with manual-in-line stabilization in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery

Author(s) -

Shipra Aggarwal,

Reena Jakhar,

Deepti Saigal,

Suniti Kale

Publication year - 2020

Publication title -

anesthesia essays and researches

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

ISSN - 0259-1162

DOI - 10.4103/aer.aer_90_20

Subject(s) - medicine , intubation , anesthesia , sore throat , tracheal intubation , surgery , airway , mann–whitney u test , apnea , exact test , elective surgery , laryngospasm

This prospective, randomized study compared CMAC ® videolaryngoscope with intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) for intubation under manual-in-line-stabilization (MILS) in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. Settings and Design: Sixty-five ASA Physical Status Classes I and II patients aged 18-65 years undergoing elective cervical spine surgery were randomly allocated into two groups: group CM-intubation with CMAC ® videolaryngoscope ( n = 33) and Group IL-intubation using ILMA ( n = 32).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research