A randomized comparison of pain control and functional mobility between proximal and distal adductor canal blocks for total knee replacement | Zendy

Christopher A. Romano | Zendy; Andrew Lloyd | Zendy; Singh Nair | Zendy; JennyY Wang | Zendy; V. Shankar | Zendy; Amaresh Vydyanathan | Zendy; Karina Gritsenko | Zendy; Naum Shaparin | Zendy; Boleslav Kosharskyy | Zendy

Open Access

A randomized comparison of pain control and functional mobility between proximal and distal adductor canal blocks for total knee replacement

Author(s) -

Christopher A. Romano,

Andrew Lloyd,

Singh Nair,

JennyY Wang,

V. Shankar,

Amaresh Vydyanathan,

Karina Gritsenko,

Naum Shaparin,

Boleslav Kosharskyy

Publication year - 2018

Publication title -

anesthesia essays and researches

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

ISSN - 0259-1162

DOI - 10.4103/aer.aer_17_18

Subject(s) - medicine , adductor canal , ropivacaine , bolus (digestion) , anesthesia , morphine , opioid , straight leg raise , randomized controlled trial , surgery , range of motion , receptor

Adductor canal blocks (ACBs) have become a popular technique for postoperative pain control in total knee arthroplasty patients. Proximal and distal ACB have been compared previously, but important postoperative outcomes have yet to be assessed.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research