z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of i-gel™ and laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed patients
Author(s) -
Badiozzaman Radpay,
Seyed Mohammad Reza Hashemian,
Nouraei Navid,
S. Razavi,
Ebrahim Zaker,
Alireza Jafari,
Parivash Eftekhari,
Golnar Radmand,
SeyedAmir Mohajerani
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
international journal of critical illness and injury science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.274
H-Index - 12
eISSN - 2231-5004
pISSN - 2229-5151
DOI - 10.4103/2229-5151.147520
Subject(s) - medicine , sore throat , insertion time , anesthesia , laryngeal mask airway , cuff , airway , laryngeal masks , supraglottic airway , cardiopulmonary resuscitation , ventilation (architecture) , significant difference , airway management , leak , surgery , resuscitation , mechanical engineering , environmental engineering , engineering
The i-gel™ is a new device introduced recently. It differs from other supraglottic airway devices. It has a non-inflatable, gel-made cuff. Previously used devices, have some disadvantages which are claimed to be absent in i-gel™. In this study we aimed to compare the performance of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA)-Classic™ and i-gel™ during anesthesia in paralyzed patients.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom