z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Three common misuses of P values
Author(s) -
Jeehyoung Kim,
Heejung Bang
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
dental hypotheses
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.164
H-Index - 10
ISSN - 2155-8213
DOI - 10.4103/2155-8213.190481
Subject(s) - null hypothesis , statistical inference , statement (logic) , meaning (existential) , p value , statistical hypothesis testing , value (mathematics)
"Significance" has a specific meaning in science, especially in statistics. The p-value as a measure of statistical significance (evidence against a null hypothesis) has long been used in statistical inference and has served as a key player in science and research. Despite its clear mathematical definition and original purpose, and being just one of the many statistical measures/criteria, its role has been over-emphasized along with hypothesis testing. Observing and reflecting on this practice, some journals have attempted to ban reporting of p-values, and the American Statistical Association (for the first time in its 177 year old history) released a statement on p-values in 2016. In this article, we intend to review the correct definition of the p-value as well as its common misuses, in the hope that our article is useful to clinicians and researchers.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here